The Official Conspiracy Theory is Fraudulent and Unbelievable
Pentagon impact not a Boeing 757 (AA flight 77)
Impact and fire did not collapse steel World Trade Center towers
Evidence of Controlled Demolition using preplanted explosives
Close US Gov Ties with Terrorists
Means: Deliberate weakening of US Air Defenses
US Air Defense Interceptors Fail
September 11, 2001 (also War Games Day!)
Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld in House Hearing on FY06 Dept. of Defense Budget
Bush administration proclivity towards mass murder and other high crimes
Motive - "It's the Money, Honey!"
Bush Government Signatories on World Domination Agenda
Historical Precedent for Attacking Own Country Prior to Invasion
Following revelations of the Bush administration lies regarding the involvement of Iraq in the 9/11 attacks and other lies, Americans voted for Obama to end combat operations in Iraq by April, 2010.
In early 2010 Obama announced that counter-terrorism operations will continue until all US troops have left Iraq which he promised for the end of 2011. Obama has also continued Bush's warmongering against Iran and North Korea, increased fighting in Afghanistan and has increased bombing in Pakistan. Young voters failed to see enough hope and change from Obama and the Congress during the 2010 mid-term election resulting in a devastatingly low turnout amongst the young voters who put him in office.
With military spending continuing to increase and the national debt spiraling out of control, more and more Americans are reassessing the basis for the US "War on Terror" including the US/NATO War in Afghanistan. As of December 2010, 60% of Americans now think the war in Afghanistan is not worth fighting and nearly 40% think the war was a mistake to begin with compared to 9% at the time of invasion.
Was the change from 9% to 40% thinking the War in Afghanistan was "a mistake to begin with" solely the result of increased awareness of lies surrounding this war of aggression and the ever mounting financial cost of an endless war? It turns out the American perception of the events of September 11, 2001 have also changed over the years and likely accounts for a great part in the renewed thinking that the War in Afghanistan was a mistake to begin with.
By October 2006, 81% of Americans felt the Bush administration was either hiding information on what they knew prior to the 9/11 attacks or mostly lying. A May 2006 poll clarified 42% of Americans felt there was a cover-up regarding 9/11.
This sentiment increases amongst better read individuals. A poll shows 89% of CNN Internet users feel there was a cover up and over 85% of Canadians felt Bush was hiding something.
These sentiments also increase as we poll closer to the location of the attacks. 50% of New Yorkers believe US leaders had foreknowledge of impending 9-11 attacks and consciously failed to act; 66% of New Yorkers call for new probe of unanswered questions by Congress or New York's Attorney General, see Zogby.
By 2007, 51% Americans were calling for a new 9/11 investigation with 30% calling for immediate impeachment of the President. This 2007 poll also found that 26.4% of likely US voters believe the Bush government let the 9/11 attacks happen [LIH] and 4.6% believe the Bush government made the attacks happen [MIH].
In July 2006 one-third of Americans thought the government either carried out the 9/11 attacks or intentionally allowed them to happen in order to provide a "false flag" pretext for war in Afghanistan. Americans learned about Bush considering a false flag operation against Iraq if the second UN resolution did not pan out. Americans also learned about Cheney planning a false flag operation to trigger war with Iran.
Worldwide, most do not blame Al Qaeda for 9/11 and 22% believe it was an inside job or with the help of Israel. For example 23% of Germans believe 9/11 was an inside job as do 36% of Turkish people and 30% of Mexican people, all close allies of the US.
As the polls get closer to the locations of al Qaeda, fewer people believe al Qaeda or Bin Ladin was responsible for 9/11. Only 5% of Pakistanis and only 10% of Indians believe al Qaeda was responsible for 9/11. Only 11% of Jordanians and 16% of Egyptians believe al Qaeda was responsible for 9/11. 80% Al-Arabia satellite TV viewers thought others, besides Bin Ladin, were behind 9/11.
Numerous Washington insiders have also expressed their lack of belief in the Bush administration story.
The Official Conspiracy Theory is Fraudulent and Unbelievable
The 9/11 Commission Report (July 22, 2004): "The 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon were far more elaborate, precise and destructive than any of (the) earlier assaults (by Al Qaeda)."
The Official Story is 19 Al-Qaeda terrorists, headed by Mohammed Atta, conspired to hijack 4 planes and fly them into the World Trade Center - South Tower and North Tower buildings and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
We are told these 9/11 terrorists were ultimately directed and sponsored by Osama bin Laden, a wealthy anti-American Saudi businessman who associates with Taliban drug lords in Afghanistan. However Osama bin Laden denies any involvement saying: "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself."
Furthermore, it appears a later confession video tape, provided by the CIA and broadcast nationwide, is fraudulent, see Fabricated Osama tapes and German investigation.
The day after the attack FBI director Robert Mueller stated: "We have in the last 24 hours, taken the passenger manifests ... and have successfully, I believe, identified many of the hijackers on each of the four flights that went down." However amazingly George Tenet decided on the day of the attack that Bin Laden was to take the blame and ABC News began reporting it as such by 11 AM on 9/11/01. This is more amazing given that very little is known about the 9/11 terrorists other than they recently entered the U.S. as students and took some flying lessons.
On September 20, 2001, the Taliban had reached an agreement with bin Laden to stand trial in Kabul or any other Muslim country based on any evidence the US provides. President Bush promptly responded with a statement that the US does not have enough evidence to convict bin Laden in court.
After many years, almost no evidence linking Bin Laden to 9/11 has surfaced. Five years after the attacks, the FBI does not list Osama bin Laden as wanted for the September 11, 2001 attacks and does not list him as wanted in the war on terrorism.
The Bush administration also stated their belief that cells of Al-Qaeda existed in Iraq and since Iraq has "weapons of mass destruction" and is a "gathering threat to the U.S.", the U.S. needs to, as a last resort, pre-emptively invade Iraq. All these beliefs turned out to be without basis in fact and the conclusions were outrageous lies.
For more on the Official Conspiracy Theory, see the recently released Zelikow Monograph.
Pentagon impact not a Boeing 757 (AA flight
77)
None of the Atta terrorists were considered good pilots, see amateurs. How can suicidal amateur pilots "precision fly" a Boeing 757 to hit the 5-story Pentagon, so close to the ground, going at 545 MPH?
The various eye witness accounts have suffered from interpretation errors and changing stories, see Gerard Holmgren. Luckily the Pentagon is a military installation surrounded by numerous live video cameras which should have definitively recorded the approaching airspace intruder/target. In fact, the Sheraton National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station and the Virginia Department of Transportation cameras had bird's eye views of what would have hit the Pentagon. The public video tapes were confiscated by government officials and no video tape has been released to the public that conclusively shows what hit the Pentagon. The FBI claims it has reviewed 84 videos that showed no Flight 77 impact.
Most recently a group of commercial pilots, called the 9/11 Pilots for Truth, analyzed the flight data recorder obtained by a freedom of information act request. According to the group, flight 77 was flying too high to hit the Pentagon a second before the impact.
 |
According to a collision simulation performed at cs.purdue.edu, a Boeing 757 fuselage traveling at 545 MPH could liquefy on impact and disappear into the entry point. However the study did not address how a 124 foot wide Boeing 757, with 2 heavy engines, could disappear into the 16-foot wide hole. |
| Nor does the
liquefaction theory explain how a plane that liquefies on impact could
punch out a hole through 3 rings of the Pentagon with the final exit
hole looking like a hole and of similar size to the entry hole. The second photo shows the Pentagon's final damage.
Although some plane wreckage parts have been displayed, upon closer investigation none were large enough for a Boeing 757. |
|
|
Impact and fire did not collapse steel World Trade Center towers
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) denies any UL certification of the twin tower design and assemblies and changed their explanations several times. NIST finally claimed the impact scrapped off fireproofing from the massive steel beams of the WTC tower(s) and the subsequent office fires softened the steel enough to initiate their collapse.
NIST did not simulate or model how the collapse progressed. The NIST analysis does not scientifically explain how the steel beams gave way throughout the gigantic steel structures and steel center columns causing a virtually symmetric and total collapse at nearly freefall speeds while concrete floors were pulverizing in mid-air from start to finish resulting in no visible pancaked floors at Ground Zero. See also beam cut in straight line in exact same fashion as a controlled demolition. |
 |  |
Instead of producing a public and well accepted mathematical simulation that matches the video of the collapses, NIST admitted very recently that "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." The US government continues to deny or misrepresent the issues presented by the 9/11 truth movement. Many of these misrepresentations and denials are exposed in Richard Gage's powerpoint and DVD presentations for Architects and Engineers as well as 911 Mysteries for the rest of us. |  |  |
Evidence of Controlled Demolition using preplanted explosives
Similar or worse office tower fires in Philadelphia in 1991 and Madrid in 2005 did not bring down those buildings. Also, in earthquake situations steel towers have toppled over but never pulverized or collapsed or been effectively demolished, see research by Richard Gage. |  |  |
Edna Cintron is still alive in this picture. Audio tapes of firefighter communications reported no out of control fires. In fact, firefighters later reported much of the fires largely burned out and indicated that conditions were controllable. See also video footage of firefighter conversations. The enormous steel frame and center columns dissipate heat throughout the structure, see steel frame and center columns during 1966-1972 construction. |  |  |
 |
 |
|
Mysteriously large quantities of hot molten iron or steel were found beneath the towers and remained molten for weeks after 9/11. The temperature-induced coloration of this molten steel indicates 1450 ° F to 1975 ° F (790 ° C to 1080 ° C).
Many scientists and engineers have stated that jet fuel and the resulting office fires at the WTCs cannot come close to generating these air temperatures let alone heating the enormous steel beams to these temperatures, see Scientific community1, Scientific community2 and Scholars for 911 Truth. |
 |
 | Recently Niels Harrit and number of chemical physicists published a paper in peer reviewed journal indicating they found active military grade explosive in the dust of the WTC collapse. Dr.
Jones talks about when nano thermite came into use in the demolition
world. It was first manufactured in large quantities in 1999 at a
factory in Maryland. Laurence Livermore Labs published the first
public account of this material in 2001.
Dr. Jones described how the nano part allows control over the sound volume of explosions. Download his physics talk in Sacramento, CA.
It is highly unlikely that Firefighter and NIST manuals were updated to reflect how to identify the use of this stealth explosive. NIST did not do forensics analysis for explosives giving the reason that no sufficiently loud explosions were heard by witnesses.
Tom Sullivan retired from Controlled Demolition Inc and explained that nano thermite is now in use along with the more traditional RDX and C4 at his old company. |
Close US Gov Ties with Terrorists
The 9/11 Commission Report (July 22, 2004): "...none of the measures adopted by the U.S. government from 1998 to 2001 disturbed or even delayed the progress of the al Qaeda plot."
According to published and confirmed mainstream reports Mohammed Atta, whom the Pentagon had knowledge of in the middle of 2000, was wired $100,000 by the Pakistani intelligence agency, the ISI, just prior to the attacks. The man who approved this wire, General Ahmad was meeting with top officials of the US government, including Intelligence Committee Chairmen Porter Goss (R-FL) and Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) on the morning of the 9/11 attacks. The FBI confirmed on ABC News (This Week, September 30, 2001) that the payment had come from banks in Pakistan. Amidst the scandal that linked him to the payment, ISI director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad was retired early by Pakistan's Military Dictator Musharraf, see Pakistan's ISI, FBI pressures resignation, Gen. Ahmad background, Scoop, Arrest of Ahmad's ISI agent Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (KSM), ABCNEWS summary, Pakistan harbors Bin Laden just before 9/11/01 and more history on US relations with Pakistan here.
Later at some point KSM was waterboarded 183 times. At some point KSM stated he was the mastermind behind 9/11 and is now regularly referred to as such in mainstream US press. Clearly this "confession" was obtained under torture. It is unclear whether the US government believes KSM was the mastermind or Bin Laden was the mastermind. A recent Pakistani ISI director, Hamid Gul, believes 9/11 was an inside job.
There is a great deal of controversy surrounding US involvement in the creation of the al Qaeda terrorist network, see Janes.com and GlobalResearch.ca. Robin Cook reports that al Qaeda is a CIA database, not a network, of former Mujaheddin fighters who were at one time on the CIA payroll. The most famous of these members is Tim Osman, better known as Osama bin Laden.
In fact there are reports that some hijackers received training at US airbases.
The Bush family has close ties to the Bin Laden family through their shared business concerns in the Carlyle Group, the 11th largest US defense contractor. The Bush administration was accused of interfering with the FBI investigation of a brother of Osama in U.S. custody who had suspected dealings with Al-Qaeda and allowing him to escape the U.S., but yet detaining thousands of other Arab Americans in Guantanamo Bay. Senator Kerry also accused Bush of outsourcing the capture of Osama Bin Laden and as a result allowing Osama to escape to Pakistan when he was cornered in Tora Bora, see escape1 and escape2.
US Intelligence was tipped that Osama Bin Laden was preparing to possibly crash a plane loaded with explosives into George W. Bush's hotel at the July 2001 Summit of G-8 nations in Genoa, Italy. In response the organizers of the G-8 Summit installed anti-aircraft batteries. In spite of a subsequent memo, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.", neither New York nor the Pentagon had functioning anti-aircraft weapons. The New York Times confirmed that the Whitehouse was warned by numerous foreign agencies and allies that an attack was imminent.
Bush stated: "Immediately following the first attack, I implemented our government's emergency response plans."
Somehow his emergency response plans allowed for Bush and his secret service(!) to continue on to a classroom visit in Sarasota Florida without fear of being the next target or interest in being involved in our defense.
|
Here is what Andrew Card told Bush: "A second plane hit the second tower. America is under attack." |
 |
 |
To this day, neither Saudi Arabia nor Pakistan have been placed on the list of countries sponsoring terrorism. To the contrary, subsequent to 9/11, Pakistan received Billions in aide from the Bush Administration including the sale of F-16 fighter aircraft, see Pakistan1, Pakistan2 and Pakistan3, and yet the weapons sold are not suitable for fighting al Qaeda.
The Bush administration's 9/11 story has changed numerous times (Bush falsehoods on 9/11) prior to the release of the 9/11 Commission Report. The families of the victims of the 9/11 tragedy have expressed their outrage at the Bush Administration over their repeated attempts to block a proper investigation. The 9/11 family steering committee has reported that the final Zelikow Monograph contains no information the families had not already read about in the press prior to the investigation.
The White House was often cited as having attempted to block the release of information to the commission and for refusing to give interviews without tight conditions attached, see something-to-hide1 & something-to-hide2. While Bush and Cheney did ultimately agree to testify, they did so only under the conditions that they would not testify under oath and there would not be any transcription for the record or any publicly available record of what they said.
The Bush administration to this day has not publicly released the FBI report or CIA report on the government failures of 9/11, nor the flight recorders of the 9/11 planes, nor the security tapes of the Pentagon crash. It was recently revealed that the Pentagon had knowledge of Atta's US-based Al-Quada cell in the middle of 2000 and subsequently covered it up from the 9/11 commission.
The Bush administration first tried to appoint Henry Kissinger (who was recently exposed to have been involved in overthrowing Chile's president Allende and the subsequent cover-up) as the head of the 9/11 commission. After great outrage from the families of the 9/11 victims, Kissinger resigned. Bush then appointed the "bi-partisan" and "pro-Bush" Kean commission which presumed the Bush administration's story instead of independently solving the crime.
The White House have been accused of attempting to derail the commission further by giving it one of the smallest independent commission funding levels in recent history ($3 million) and by starting the commission's investigation 441 days after the tragedy and releasing most details 4 years after 9/11! Most of the physical evidence was quickly secured, removed and recycled, and therefore not available for independent investigation.
The Bush Administration are also defendants in a RICO lawsuit filed by some of the victims of the 9/11 disaster, see RICO1 and RICO2. The prosecutors have stated an obvious conflict of interest for the President to have any involvement in the creation or outcome of a 9/11 investigation.
Means: Deliberate weakening of US Air Defenses
US Air Defense Interceptors Fail
The 9/11 Commission Report (July 22, 2004): "Existing FAA and NORAD protocols on 9/11 were unsuited in every respect for an attack in which hijacked planes were used as weapons."
The Bush
administration claimed there were no pre-existing Air Defenses to
prevent 9/11 and that subsequent to 9/11, the FAA got their
procedures
figured out and NORAD got better funding, see US
Air Defense post-9/11.
This flies in the face of actual FAA standing operating procedures: FAA Emergency Situations, FAA Emergency Determinations, FAA Air Defense Liaison Officers, FAA Escort of Hijacked Aircraft and Aircraft Piracy (Hijacking) and Destruction of Derelict Airborne Objects.
The summary of these procedures is simply as follows: All commercial flights must log their flight plans with the FAA prior to departure. If a commercial airliner is off course by 2 miles or out of contact for 10 minutes, FAA contacts NORAD to automatically scramble fighter aircraft to intercept. See discussion by fighter pilot Lt. Col. Bowman (US Air Force).
The Air Guard has a mandate to intercept wayward planes independent of the FAA, see Pre-9/11 Air National Guard Mission Statement. Since G.W. Bush served in the Texas Air National Guard, he would be intimately familar with these operations. However shortly before 9/11 the Columbia National Air Guard changed their mission statement from "To provide combat units in the highest possible state of readiness.. we will provide operational support to our local communities whenever possible" to:
"... supporting and defending the USA and the Nation's Capital when directed by THE PRESIDENT (emphasis added)"
According to the FAA between 09/00 and 06/01 the standing operating procedure successfully launched NORAD fighters on 67 occasions to escort wayward aircraft. The FAA also claims to have informed NORAD in a timely manner on 9/11. The 9/11 commission finally admitted they were deliberately being deceived by the Pentagon in this matter.
Had they followed this procedure on 9/11/01, the first hijacked plane would have been intercepted before hitting the World Trade Center. Instead fighter planes were scrambled at 9:24 am, 34 minutes after the third plane veered off course and headed towards Washington, and after both the first and second towers were hit. For more on this timeline see: COOP, or see the succinct Clarity Flash video presentation.
A few researchers have suggested that the Bush Administration officially weakened the air defense capabilities by adding bureaucratic layers of approval including a June 1, 2001 Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff memo changing previous derelict aircraft intercept procedure to now require Donald Rumsfeld's approval.
Prof. David Griffin has researched the anti-aircraft systems at the Pentagon and reports that they are designed to automatically shoot down approaching derelict airborne objects that are not transmitting a military transponder signal. A year after 9/11, the Pentagon beefed up their anti-aircraft systems, see Clear Skies II.
The Zelikow Monograph has revealed that the commercial jetliners could be programmed to fly automatically to the World Trade Centers, however only with the aide of secret entry codes. If this is how the planes were guided, it appears only an insider could have provided these entry codes to the terrorists.
Many media sources were propagating the fallacy that it was important to know who was planning the attacks in order to prevent them, see warnings ignored1 and warnings ignored2. In December 2003, the mainstream press reported that Air Defense procedures were in place to prevent 9/11, see 9/11 was preventable. It is a very important point that these procedures do not require the knowledge of specifically who is going to attack. The procedures work against any attacker using what should have been well-defended methods of attack used by the 9/11 plotters.
Instead of receiving a reprimand, General Richard Myers, who was in command of NORAD on 9/11/01, was subsequently promoted to Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff. The Bush administration continues to this day to deny that 9/11 was preventable by then-existing procedures and budgets.
The 9/11 Commission Report (July 22, 2004): "Planes were scrambled, but ineffectively, as they did not know where to go or what targets they were to intercept."
Many Air Defense bases existed within reach of the Pentagon and New York.
Cheney apparently gave the order to shoot down the fourth hijacked plane between 10:10 and 10:15 am after the plane had already crashed in Pennsylvania.
Alternatively, Robert Ayling, a former boss of British Airways, suggested that jumbo aircraft could have been commandeered from the ground and controlled remotely in the event of a hijack. The 9/11 Commission Report does not talk about what happened to this option.
September 11, 2001 (also War Games Day!)
The 9/11 Commission Report (July 22, 2004): "In pursuing our mandate, we have reviewed more than 2.5 million pages of documents and interviewed more than 1,200 individuals in ten countries. This included nearly every senior official from the current and previous administrations who had responsibility for topics covered in our mandate... From the outset, we have been committed to share as much of our investigation as we can with the American people."
The 9/11 Commission Report did not reveal anything about war games occurring on September 11, 2001. However the National Reconnaissance Office scheduled an exercise drill on September 11, 2001 in which an errant aircraft crashes into one of its buildings. On the morning of the real 9/11 attacks! Associated Press got this story from a 2002 Homeland Security Conference held in Chicago.
NORAD had regularly simulated a hijacked airliner crashing into a building and believes it is part of their responsibility to defend against these situations.
In fact during the morning of 9/11 four U.S. sponsored war games were taking place, some involving "live-fly" exercises where actual aircraft were simulating the behavior of hijacked airliners in real life.
Was this what paralyzed the FAA, NORAD and the Air Defense fighter pilots? General Myers said to the contrary the exercises enhanced our response:
Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld in House Hearing on FY06 Dept. of Defense Budget
Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-GA): The question was, we had four war games going on September 11th, and the question that I tried to pose before the Secretary had to go to lunch was whether or not the activities of the four war games going on September 11th actually impaired our ability to respond to the attacks.
Gen. Richard Myers: The answer to the question is no, it did not impair our response, in fact General Eberhart who was in the command of the North American Aerospace Defense Command as he testified in front of the 9/11 Commission I believe - I believe he told them that it enhanced our ability to respond, given that NORAD didn't have the overall responsibility for responding to the attacks that day. That was an FAA responsibility. But they were two CPXs; there was one Department of Justice exercise that didn't have anything to do with the other three; and there was an actual operation ongoing because there was some Russian bomber activity up near Alaska. So we -
Cynthia McKinney: Let me ask you this, then: who was in charge of managing those war games?
Chairman Hunter (R-CA): General, why don't you give the best answer that you can here in a short a period of time and we'll - the gentle lady wants to get a written answer anyway, and then we can move on to other folks.
General Myers: The important thing to realize is that North American Aerospace Defense Command was responsible. These are command post exercises; what that means is that all the battle positions that are normally not filled are indeed filled; so it was an easy transition from an exercise into a real world situation. It actually enhanced the response; otherwise, it would take somewhere between 30 minutes and a couple of hours to fill those positions, those battle stations, with the right staff officers.
Taken from House Hearing Video and Transcript, also on C-span. See also War Games for more details.
These exercises very much contradict Condoleezza Rice's testimony that nobody could have imagined using planes as missiles. Furthermore, US defense department insider Timothy McNiven has testified with a lie detector that the exact 9/11 scenario as it occurred in New York was devised by the US government in 1976 at the request of the Congress for the purpose of strengthening our defenses against such an attack.
Bush administration proclivity towards mass murder and other high crimes
The behavior of the US government in many ways appears to mimic actions taken during pre-Nazi Germany.
Motive - "It's the Money, Honey!"
Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 movie and reader have made convincing arguments showing how Bush's "War on Terror" had the benefit of US control of oil in Iraq and the US ownership of an oil pipeline through Afghanistan.
Launching these wars has also helped justify the $420 Billion and growing annual budgets of the Pentagon and the approximately $80 Billion supplemental war appropriations each year. Companies like Halliburton, Kellogg Brown and Root and all the defense contractors including the Carlyle Group are "making a killing".
There are also interesting arguments to show US Government involvement in the Drug Trade, similar to the Iran-Contra affair: CIA-ISI Drug connection and Guns-Oil-Drugs (G.O.D.).
The US government needed a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. Falsely accusing Bin Laden (Afghanistan) and Saddam Hussein (Iraq) for 9/11 achieved this purpose very well. Most Americans agreed with these invasions based on the country being linked to al Qaeda.
It has been reported that the Iraq War was planned prior to 9/11 and that it was decided to use 9/11 as a pretext within hours of the tragic attacks themselves. During the occupation of Iraq, the Bush administration used torture to try to falsely create a link to al Qaeda. If 9/11 was an inside job, blaming Iraq, attacking Iraq and then trying to plant evidence would be called a false flag operation.
I would call blaming Iraq the second false flag operation because it actually came after the US government first blaming Bin Laden and using that as a justification to invade Afghanistan. As we've seen earlier, there is no credible confession or other evidence that Bin Laden was the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. Also we already have KSM, another reported mastermind in US custody.
It was recently reported that Cheney planned another false flag operation to create the pretext for war with Iran.
Bush Government Signatories on World Domination Agenda
Project for the New American Century (PNAC) is a neo-conservative think-tank that promotes an ideology of total U.S. world domination through the use of force. The group embraces and disseminates an ideology of faith in force, U.S. supremacy, and rejection of the rule of law in international affairs.
The group's core ideas are expressed in a September 2000 report produced for Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, and Lewis Libby entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century. The Sunday Herald referred to the report as a "blueprint for U.S. world domination."
PNAC's membership includes people such as Richard Perle, Elliot Abrams, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and William Kristol. See Old American Century for more details.
It is also evident that most of the Kean Commission recommendations fit nicely into the Joint Military Vision for 2020 which in turn fits nicely into the PNAC plan.
The embassy cable leaks and other war time leaks from Wikileaks has widely exposed the lies that the US government has told the American people regarding the motives behind foreign policy matters including actions taken. A closer examination of the leaked documents show that, with the exception of the axis of evil countries, almost all other governments in the world take orders from the United States.
Historical Precedent for Attacking Own Country Prior to Invasion
Proponents of this theory often point to historical precedents, in which governments have allegedly planned to use tragedy in order to gain support for unpopular policies. Jones and others draw parallels between these precedents and the use of 9/11 to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
On September 12, 2005 (4 years after 9/11) the Bush Administration released a less redacted version of the Zelikow Monograph. This report provides some additional details on the Official Theory but does not contradict or address the observations brought up in this article or other 9/11 articles mentioned above.
|
The defense would not like to present any new information on the grounds that it might jeopardize national security. George W. Bush will take the 5th Amendment and not testify as he might incriminate himself.
Third parties such as Popular Mechanics and BBC News have tried to intervene to defend the Official Conspiracy Theory. However most of these debunking efforts fail to address issues presented in this article. Recently the Popular Mechanics team was forced to explore some of these issues during a debate with Loose Change filmmakers. More recently Matt Taibbi debated David Ray Griffin. |  |
The defense would like to point out that the prosecution did not explain all the details of how the defendant supposedly committed the crime of 9/11. In other words the prosecution has no idea as to who did what, when and how. The lack of these details should create reasonable doubt in the minds of the readers. You wouldn't want to convict a President based on circumstantial evidence alone, now would ya?
People worldwide began their own investigations and presentations of the impossibility of the official conspiracy theory. I especially like Randy Louis, Mike Ruppert, Prof. David Griffin, Eric Blumrich, Roedy Green and of course this article. Very little if any of the information in these articles was disclosed by major media outside of Manhattan, although most of the information contained herein has been fact-checked by multiple newspapers and researchers.
If the reader remains doubtful, please note that almost every assertion in this article has a link to a more detailed report. I would especially recommend the following:
Prof. David Griffin's New Pearl Harbor * Air Defenses flash video * Pentagate flash video * Government Insider Says Bush Authorized 9/11 Attacks * Painful Deceptions film shown on Manhattan TV * NY 911 Truth * Guns and Butter radio show * Wikipedia
For mostly purposes of entertainment, I recommend the following movies / TV shows:
Star Wars (1977, 2005) * The Matrix (1999) * Ocean's Eleven (2001) * The Lone Gunman (pilot TV series, 2001)The author would also like to re-iterate that the mainstream press agrees that then existing systems and procedures were in place to prevent 9/11.
Based on the disclosures and arguments provided in this article, the Bush Administration must have approved of the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon on 9/11/01, and without whose assistance the attacks would not have been possible. This conclusion is based on an overwhelming set of otherwise highly unlikely events and defense policies occurring on 9/11 and since then.
Atta and company were participants and officially took the blame, however the official story that they conspired and carried out the attacks is bogus beyond any reasonable doubt.
There is no need to find or kill potential terrorists abroad or temporarily (or permanently) take away constitutional rights afforded to American citizens.
However if the reader is not thoroughly convinced, at the very least, there is enough evidence to call for an end to the US "War on Terror".
